Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Animal Cruelty Laws: Progress at Last!

In November, I posted this entry. Now, 4 months later, an Alberta MP is vying for Ottawa's attention to Canada's animal cruelty laws. Myron Thompson tabled over 111,000 signatures from 4 different petitions in an effort to get Canada's animal cruelty laws toughened.

The ball is rolling, thanks to all of you who signed the petition. The article mentions Bills S-213 and C-373. Tamara Chaney, the woman behind the petition I asked many of you to sign, is in favour of Bill C-373, and so am I. Having read both Bills, it is clear that Bill S-213 is insufficient change to the current animal cruelty laws. It is vague, and does not adequately address the issue of "property".

I encourage all of you to write to your MPs to endorse Bill C-373. This change has been 25 years in waiting, let's make it count.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Tory Concern

A news post on CBC.ca has revealed that Prime Minister Harper apparently wrote a letter back in 2002, that says he called the Kyoto Accord a "socialist scheme". At the time, he was leader of the Canadian Alliance party, now no longer in existence. He intended to fight then Prime Minister Chretien on the signing of the Kyoto Accord.

Now, with Canadians voicing concern over the environment, and Canada's role in the care of it, this comes as terrible news for the Conservatives. It casts a pall over the new Tory commitment to the Clean Air Act, and may sway the public more towards the Liberals. Not only does the Clean Air Act have undeniable similarities to the Liberals' own environmental plan, but the Conservatives have also been accused of ignoring Canada's signed commitment to the Kyoto Protocol.

While I don't particularly agree with the idea of the Kyoto Accord being a "social scheme", I also find it hard to hold Harper's history against him. As a former leader of the Canadian Alliance party, it's clear that there would be a stockpile of things the Liberals might use to denounce Harper's commitment to the environment. This is something that could be done against any number of former opposition leaders.

The Liberals were the ones who endorsed the Kyoto Accord, but why is it that we're not approaching our targets 5 years after the agreement was ratified? Why is it that after promising and throwing billions of dollars at environmental clean-up plans, we are up nearly 30% past our 2012 targets? I really don't think the Liberals should be the ones calling on the Conservatives to clean-up their act.

We'll see how this plays out in the media. But I am still concerned that Harper may not be as committed to the environment as he should be.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, November 23, 2006

A Nation of Nations

Because I so thoroughly enjoy the randomness of politics, I've decided to tackle the latest controversy in the House of Commons: Quebec as a Nation.

A motion was introduced recently by the Bloc Quebecois to recognize Quebec as a nation, but does not add any further specifications or conditions. Prime Minister Harper replied yesterday that he would introduce his own motion to recognize Quebec as a nation "within a united Canada."

"Our position is clear. Do the Quebecois form a nation within Canada? The answer is yes. Do the Quebecois form an independent nation? The answer is no and will always be no."
- Prime Minister Stephen Harper

Bloc Quebecois leader Gilles Duceppe fired back today that Quebec should be recognized as a nation "that is currently within Canada." He accused the PM of using "partisan tactics" to sway members of the House.

"Never should the existence of the Quebec nation be subjected to what your preferred option is."
- BQ Leader Gilles Duceppe

The Liberals have agreed to support Harper on his motion. However not all MPs agree with it. Some say this may open the door to other "nations," such as Acadia, Newfoundland, etc. Others are unsure this is the correct approach to the situation, stating that Canada is not a nation of nations.

"Are we in Canada to be a nation of nations?"
- Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis

Jack Leyton and his NDP party have agreed to support both motions. WTF?! Typical cop-out, neutral position and I suppose this shouldn't come as too much of a surprise.

I am of the opinion that while this is better than allowing Quebec to go off on its own sovereigntist ways, it is both politically motivated and altogether sad. Don't get me wrong, this is a brilliant move on Harper's part, giving him better access to Quebec seats as well as downplaying the possibility of another major sovereignty debate. Granted, it is a concession to even consider Quebec as anything other than just a part of Canada but a necessary one if he was to avoid outright disagreement with the BQ.

Quebec Premier Jean Charest was happy with the announcement and even encouraged the BQ and Quebecers to support Harper's motion. MP Belinda Stronach also voiced her support of Harper's motion stating that it's a move in the right direction if it helps Quebec to "protect its unique culture and identity." I agree, if this is what must be done to appease separatists (though I in no way believe that that's the feeling they have right now), then it must be done. And I recognize that Quebec has a very unique culture and identity having lived there for five years. But having a unique identity does not entitle it, or any other province for that matter, to special treatment as its own nation.

While it is still undetermined as to when Harper will introduce the motion, there will be debate and controversy, but this is really the least of our problems. C'mon now people, let's focus on more important matters like Peace on Earth and Goodwill towards Men.

Labels:

Saturday, October 28, 2006

Why I Support Stephen Harper

Here are the facts, as they pertain to this entry:

- These are my personal opinions.
- I am not a political science student, nor do I have any extended knowledge about politics.
- I accept that news broadcasts are highly biased, and thus cannot be taken completely to heart.

People always ask me, "why do you support Stephen Harper and his Conservative party?" My answer is fairly simple, or at least it's simple to me. I understand that many Canadians believe Mr Harper to be the anti-christ. They believe his views align more closely with those of President Bush than is healthy for our country. They believe the Tories seek to restrain Canada's growth by imposing conservative values on the rest of the country. And finally, that the Tories have only the Western provinces' best interests in mind.

I support Mr Harper and his Tories for these reasons:

1) He promised to lower the GST by one percent immediately and by another percent in the near future. By God, we're now at 6% instead of at 7%. For those that don't know, GST was never intended to be a permanent thing. It was only supposed to be temporary, and its reduction inevitable. That the Tories actually did something about it, is impressive. The lowering of GST benefits all Canadians right away. Additionally, as an Albertan (who doesn't need to pay PST), the drop from 7% (in total) to 6% (again, in total) is fabulous.

2) He's getting rid of the costly and ineffective gun registry. The fact that this program is costing Canadians millions of dollars every year for very little return is reason enough to shut it down. We need a government that will recognize when an initiative is failing, cut the losses, and run. "Nip it in the bud" as they say. That the gun registry was supposed to help prevent incidents like the Dawson shooting is further proof that the system does not work.

3) He's pushing the opposition to explain themselves. Why should they oppose the tougher anti-crime legislation? Why would the opposition vote in favour of allowing arsonists, thieves and muggers to serve their sentences at home (under house arrest)? These kinds of people should be behind bars, where they belong.

4) The Conservatives have introduced the Clean Air Act. This piece of legislation has reasonable goals and objectives in mind. There will be consultations with the major players in the various industries which contribute most heavily to the green house gas emissions, and then goals will be set. The Clean Air Act has been coupled with the Energy Efficiency Act which will strive towards reducing wasted energy (in the form of heat).

5) Harper is pushing to put more police officers on the streets of Canada. I don't know about you, but I feel much safer knowing there are cops out on the streets watching us. They are there to serve and to protect. How can they protect the public if they're all sitting around in police stations doing paperwork? This is pursuant to the fact that street racing has become an even larger problem in recent years. Many deaths have resulted from street racing in Canada's major metropolitan cities, like Vancouver and Toronto. This rampant style of crime has to stop. We are all in danger if such things do not cease immediately.

6) Mr Harper has put Canada on the international stage with a more proactive role in peacekeeping missions and anti-terrorist activities. The Prime Minister has done nothing but support our troops in our military missions since he came into power. We have been embarrassed one too many times by failing Sea King helicopters that kill our own troops before even reaching the war zones. Investment in our military is important if we are to become less dependent on the United States for protection. Harper has also disallowed the press from creating media circuses out of the military funerals. By preventing them from using the footage to argue against the war, he has done our soldiers a great service. They voluntarily offer their lives to serve and protect us; all Canadians should be mindful of that. Yes, there will be casualties, that is the price of war. But we have been slow to realize this fact, that soldiers have in no way been coerced into doing things they shouldn't be doing. We don't employ conscription in Canada, and thus there is no argument in saying that soldiers are dying for a war they didn't want. They volunteered for Christ's sake! If they didn't want to go overseas to defend our country and the safety of our citizens, then they simply wouldn't go. Or better yet, they wouldn't sign up for service. The media has shamelessly used the deaths of our soldiers to wage a more subtle war against Mr Harper and his Conservative party. To turn the valiant sacrifices of our men and women fighting overseas into fodder for use against the Tories makes me sick. It really makes me sick.

7) Stephen Harper is the Prime Minister of Canada. It is his job to represent all Canadians and to do what is in their best interests. He cannot govern this country with the support of only the Western provinces. He simply cannot. It is not possible, when the largest concentration of Canadians lies in Ontario around the Greater Toronto Area. And therefore, it is illogical to think that he would do things which only increase his popularity in the West. If anything, he's done everything he could to improve things equally for all Canadians. He wants what's best for us, all of us.

And that is why I support Stephen Harper. I invite you to criticize and comment on these seven points. Bring it on.

Labels: ,